U.S.V.PRASAD v. THE A.P.S.R.T.C., REP BY ITS MD AND ANOTHERS
WP/10792/2016 · 2025-10-09
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57267 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57267 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010104132016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10792 OF 2016 Between:
1. U.S.V.Prasad Reddy, S/o late U.Obul Reddy, E.500027 Driver, Aged about 32 years, Rio D.No.28/9/14/61, Ganesh Street, Venkateswara Puram, Nellore, Nellore District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep.by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC X Roads, Hyderabad.
2. The Regional Manager APSRTC, Nellore Region, Nellore, Nellore District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner as Shramik under Bread Winner Scheme and not implementing 30% Reservation as per Recruitment Regulations as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the principles of Natural Justice and violative to Art.14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Shramik under Bread Winner Scheme, and pass such other
order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: S M SUBHAN
2
Counsel for the Respondents: P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 06.10.2025 before the Registry stating that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate grounds pending disposal of the writ petition, he seeks permission of the Court for withdrawal of the writ petition.
Considering the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in view of the letter dated 06.10.2025, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.10.2025 Rns
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.10792 of 2016
Date: 10.10.2025 RNS