APHC010018022022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 46/2022 Between: 1. E.V.RAMESH KUMAR, S/O. ANAND RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC- DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF JAILS, VENTRAL PRISON, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS, KADAPA RANGE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTIRCT. ...RESPONDENT(S): pleased to declare the action of the respondents and set aside the impugned order vide proceedings No. Estt 2/93/2018, dated - 31.07.2018 issued by the 2nd respondent and consequential proceedings No. DIG(KR)/SA(E)/2202/2018, dated 28.09.2018 issued by the 3rd respondent is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and totally non application of mind and violation of Principles Of Natural Justice apart from Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to recovery the difference of pay and allowances drawn and paid to the applicant 2 on account of stepping up of their pay on par with junior in pursuance of impugned order vide proceedings No.Estt-2/93/2018, dated - 31.07.2018 and 28.09.2018 to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dt 3-10-2018 in O.A.No.2200/2018 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S N SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION (AT) NO: 46/2022 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition (AT) does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition (AT). Therefore, the Writ Petition (AT) becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.10.2025 TTPPSS 4 108 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION (AT) NO: 46/2022 09.10.2025 TTPPSS