B.L. AGRAWAL v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1)
REVP/238/2025 · 2025-08-21
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57251 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57251 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:42579-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR REVP No. 238 of 2025 B.L. Agrawal S/o Ram Kumar Agrawal Aged About 58 Years R/o Mayur Bhawan Near Radha Krishna Saw Mill, New Timber Market Fafadih Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2(1) Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondent
(Cause title is taken from the CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Tankha Sr. Advocate (appeared through video conferencing) along with Mr. Krishna Tandon, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Hemant Gupta, CGC Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.08.22 17:28:48 +0530
2 22.08.2025
1. Heard Mr. Vivek Tankha Sr. Advocate (appeared through video conferencing) along with Mr. Krishna Tandon, counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hemant Gupta, Central Government Counsel for the respondent.
2. By way of this review petition, the petitioner has sought following prayer :
“In view of the order dated 03.04.2025 passed in TAXC No.110/2017, 105/2017, 109/2017 and 111/2017 may be recalled/review after giving due opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner in the interest of justice.”
3. The instant review petition filed by the petitioner against the final
judgment and order dated 03.04.2025 passed by this Court in TAXC No. 110/2017, 105/2017, 109/2017 and 111/2017.
4. The default reported by the Registry that separate review petition are required to be filed for each case, whereas in the present case only one review petition has been filed against the order passed in different TAXC petitions, which were decided by the common order.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he wants to withdraw the instant review petition with liberty to file separate review petition.
3
6. In view of the above, the instant review petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice
Vasant