Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57249 (CHH)

ISHWAR NAVARANGE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/6310/2025 · 2025-08-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42393 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 6310 of 2025 1 - Ishwar Navarange S/o Tulsi Ram Navarange Aged About 32 Years R/o Mopka, Bhatapara Gramin, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Suresh Diwakar S/o Panchram Diwakar Aged About 46 Years R/o Gram- Mopka, Police Station Bhatapara Gramin, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ...Applicants versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Bhatapara Gramin, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ..Non-applicant For Applicants : Mr. Tessy Abraham, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order On Board 21.08.2025 1. The applicants have preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with Crime No. 282/2025, registered at Police Station – Bhatapara Gramin, District – Balodabazar(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 333, 109, 3(5) & 332(B) of the VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2025.08.23 11:47:27 +0530 2 Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. The prosecution story in brief, that on 29/04/2025 at 9:30 PM both the applicants with an intention to kill went to the house of the victim and attacked him with a blade. Thereafter offences under section 333, 109 and 3(5) of BNS was registered at police station Bhatapara (Gramin) against the applicants. After the investigation police also registered section 332(kha) of BNS and they have taken into custody on 30/04/2025. 3. The applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, as the prosecution story is concocted, baseless, and does not disclose any offence against them. They have been unnecessarily entangled in the alleged offence only to harass them. The applicants are permanent residents with both movable and immovable properties, and there is no likelihood of their absconding or tampering with prosecution witnesses. They are ready to furnish adequate surety and undertake to abide by all conditions that may be imposed by this Hon’ble Court, therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicants. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application of the present applicants and submits that the present applicants assaulted the injured due to which the injured received grievous injuries, therefore, the applicants are not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature 3 and gravity of the offence, the manner in which the applicants armed with a sharp-edged weapon assaulted the victim with an intention to kill, and the material available in the case diary, it is evident that the victim sustained grievous injuries which were dangerous to life. The offences alleged are of a serious nature, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for granting bail to the applicants. 7. Accordingly, the bail application of the applicants – Ishwar Navarange & Suresh Diwakar involved in Crime No. 282/2025, registered at Police Station – Bhatapara Gramin, District – Balodabazar(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 333, 109, 3(5) & 332(B) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, is rejected. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav