Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57248 (KAR)

SRI P SUBRAMANI ALIAS SUBBU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/33643/2024 · 2025-07-15

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26028 WP No. 33643 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 33643 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI P.SUBRAMANI ALIAS SUBBU S/O BYCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, SCHEDULE CASTE, KARATE MASTER, PETECHAMANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TOWN-563 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 101. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR-563 101. Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26028 WP No. 33643 of 2024 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KOLAR RURAL POLICE STATION, KOLAR-563 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE NO. 56/2024 ANNX-A DTD. 17.09.2024 ISSUED BY THE POLICE INSPECTOR, KOLAR RURAL POLICE STATION, KOLAR. DIRECT THE R-2 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS AT ANNX- B, B1, B2 AND B3 DTD. 21.09.2024, 24.10.2024 AND 25.10.2024 POSITIVELY CONSIDERING THE MATERIALS / DETAILS FURNISHED TO THE REPRESENTATIONS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has challenged the Notice at Annexure-A dated 17.09.2024. By virtue of the Notice dated 17.09.2024, show cause has been issued to the petitioner as to make out grounds as to why his name must not be included in the rowdy sheeter list. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26028 WP No. 33643 of 2024 2. During the pendency of the matter, learned Additional Government Advocate files a memo and produces copy of the order dated 07.06.2024 by the respondent - Police whereby petitioner's name has been included in the rowdy sheeter list. 3. It is to be noticed that the order including the petitioner in the rowdy sheeter list is 07.06.2024 while the notice at Annexure-A is issued thereafter on 17.09.2024. The guidelines laid down by this Court in the context including names of persons in rowdy sheeter list in W.P.No.4504/2021 and connected matters mandates that before the name of a person is included in the rowdy sheeter list, the copy must be marked to such person to enable him to take a stand. 4. In light of the notice having been sent at Annexure-A after the order passed on 07.06.2024, the order of 07.06.2024 produced along with a memo is set aside as also consequential proceedings while reserving liberty to - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26028 WP No. 33643 of 2024 the respondent - Authority if facts are so made out to take fresh action in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1