APHC010292572021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18412/2021 Between: GANGULA SAIDULU, S/O VENKAYYA , AGED 50 YRS ,OCC.AGRICULTURAL BUDAWADA VILLAGE, 3AGGAYYAPETA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI , AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER SHO, CHILLLAKALLU P.S., CHILLAKALLU , KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILLAKALLU POLICE STATOIN, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. NANDA KISHORE AHIRRAO, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ULTRA TECH CEMENT BUDAWADA VILLAGE, 3AGGAYYAPETA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Police particularly 3rd and 4th Respondent trying to Interfere into the Petitioner Private Landed Property in an Extent of AC 2-51 cents in S.No.79/1 Budawada Village, Jaggayyapeta Mandal Krishna District only with the influence of un official Respondent No. 5 using force as against the Petitioner to leave some land towards ingress and egress for 5th Respondent Company if not warned that they will register a case all are 2 illegal, unlawful , Arbitrary , Violation of Principles of Natural Justice , Violaton of Article 14,19,21,300A of the Constitution of India , it is nothing but interfering into the Civil Disputes Consequently to direct the Respondent No. 4 and 5 officials not to interfere nor threaten the petitioner in connection with the Petitioner Private Property as a Civil dispute in any manner or what so ever in the interest of the justice.” 2. Sri R.Siva Sai Swaroop, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, with the influence of Respondent No.5, the Police are interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18412 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh