APHC010635372023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 32776/2023 Between: 1. KINCHEYI VIJAY KUMAR, SON OF LATE GANAPATHI, AGED 21 YEARS, SCHEDULED CASTE. RESIDENT OF MONDIKOTA VILLAGE, PEDABAYALU MANDALAM, ALURI SEETH RAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REBY. ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY,HOME DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALLURI SEETHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT, PADERU, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ALLURI SEETHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT, PADERU, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE COMMISSION OF ANDHRA STATE SCHEDULE TRIBES, REP BY ITS SECREATARY RESIDENT OF ROOM NO. 108, R AND B BUILDING MG ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDDABAYALU POLICE STATION, ALLURI SEETHA RAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents more particularly respondent No.2 to 4 in respect of my representations dated 07.10.2023, 19.09.2023, 22.09.2023 to take action against one Sri Puli Manoj Kumar Sub Inspector of Police, Head Constable K. Hemanth who threatened me with dire consequence and slapped me on my ear for not giving land to construct Jio cell tower in my private property in survey no. 2-lb which is an extent of Ac.0.88 Cents of Modikota Village, Peddabayalu Mandal, Alluri Seetha Rama District, which is highly illegal arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take action in respect of representation dated 07.10.2023, 19.09.2023, 22.09.2023and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUDE SAI KUMAR NAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: Today, when the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner today. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 32776 of 2023 09.10.2025 Mjl /*