JENUGU SURYANARAYANA, W.G. DIST v. CHAIRMAN & M.D., APEPDCL., VISAKHAPATNAM & 3 OT
WP/37011/2016 · 2025-10-09
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57231 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57231 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010851912016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37011/2016 Between:
1. JENUGU SURYANARAYANA, W.G. DIST, S/O LATE JOGULU, MALE, AGE: 75 YEARS, RETIRED UDC, (A.P.S. ELECTRICITY BOARD ), KASPA PENTAPADU VILLAGE, PENTAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. CHAIRMAN M D APEPDCL VISAKHAPATNAM 3 OT, DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD., (CORPORATE OFFICE) VISAKHAPATNAM,
2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HRD A P ELECTRICITY POWER, DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD., (CORPORATE OFFICE) VISAKHAPATNAM,
3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, A.P.ELECTRICITY POWER DISTRIBUTION CO., LTD. CORPORATION CIRCLE, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER A P ELECTRICITY POWER DISTRIBUTION, CO., LTD. OPERATIONS, TADEPALLIGUDEM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ direction or orders by declaring the action of the respondents in no finalizing the petitioner appeal filed on dt.25.09.1999 as per the GO Ms No.679 dt.01.11.2008 and BPMs No.44 dt.20.05.1997 which is illegal, arbitrary, non-est, and volatile of principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondents to settle
2
all the back wages, pension benefits, attendant benefits attached to the employment of the petitioner and and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 45601 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents for fixation of pension of the petitioner by taking into consideration of continuity of service from 30.06.1999, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DASAKA MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The court made the following ORDER:-
Sri Tallapragada Sriram, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Corporation. 2. At the time of considering the matter, Ms. R. Durga Latha Sri, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to work out other remedies available in law. 3. Permission is accorded and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.10.2025 GVK
3
52
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.37011 of 2016
Date: 10.10.2025
GVK