Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5723 (KAR)

HONNURAPPA S/O KOLLARAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/100145/2025 · 2025-06-25

K V Aravind, R Devdas

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8015-DB CCC No. 100145 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100145 OF 2025 BETWEEN: HONNURAPPA S/O KOLLARAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT HANUMAN NAGAR, 17TH WARD, RUPANAGUDI ROAD, BALLARI 583102. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA G., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BALLARI DISTRICT, BALLARI 583101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BALLARI SUB-DIVISION, BALLARI 583101. 4. THE TAHASILDAR OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, BALLARI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT 583101. …ACCUSED THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO, ISSUE NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENT NO.4 CALLING UPON THEM AS TO WHY CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS SHALL NOT BE INITIATED AGAINST THEM FOR HAVING WILFULLY VIOLATED ORDER DATED 20/1/2023 PASSED BY HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.105491/2022 & ETC. THIS CCC, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: VINAYAKA B V Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.06.26 10:21:08 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8015-DB CCC No. 100145 of 2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS) On the previous date, i.e., on 18.06.2025, the following order was passed. “Case is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner/ complainant. Office has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the contempt petition. Relist this case on 25.06.2025. If there is no representation for the petitioner on the next date of hearing the contempt petition will be dismissed.” 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner/complainant. 3. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE MBS CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8