Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57227 (AP)

Makala Naga Durga Prasad @ G.N.D. Prasad v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1699/2019 · 2025-10-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010036522019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1699/2019 Between: 1. MAKALA NAGA DURGA PRASAD @ G.N.D. PRASAD, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO,OCC. ADVOCATE, AGED 51 YEARS, 6/2, PANDARIPURAM D. NO. 5-78-51/A GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, NELAPADU, AMARAVATHI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE/STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION,PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. TELAPROLU KRISHNA RAO, S/O.T. SAMBAIAH LATE, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC.UNEMPLOYEE, R/O.H.NO.5-78- 58,59,60, PANDARIPURAM 6/2 GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2 6. TELAPROLU ALIVELU MANGATHAYARU, W/O TELAPROLU KRISHNA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE,. GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 7. N V V SATYANARAYANA, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC.RTD. MANAGER IN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMP., R/O.MANJU ENCLAVE, BESIDE SARADA THEATRE KOPRA MUNICIPALITY HYDERABAD,TELANGANA STATE 8. N VENKATA RAMANI, W/O N.V.V.SATYANARAYANA SA) NOT KNOWN, AGED 66 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O.MANJU ENCLAVE, BESIDE SARADA THEATRE KOPRA MUNICIPALITY HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 4 in not registering the complaint dated 06-10-2018 lodged by the petitioner against the Respondents 5 to 9 on the file of the 4th respondent is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and apart from violation of the provisions of Criminal Procedure as well as apart from violation of Article 14 a 21 of the Constitution of India, and Consequently direct the official respondents to register the complaint dt.06-10- 2018 lodged by the petitioner, in the light of the directions of Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari's case, and conduct enquiry, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to protect the life and limb of the petitioner includes her husband and child from the Respondents 5 to 8 forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T S N MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1699 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri T S N Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition, as the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 09.10.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1699 of 2019 Date: 09.10.2025 PSA