APHC010628682016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 44974/2016 Between: 1. VATTIKALLA BHARATI,, W/O. LOVA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC:HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 6C-11/8-1/1, SOUTHERN STREET, NEAR MARKANDEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. VATTIKALLA SATYANARAYANA @ SATTIBABU,, S/O. LOVA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC:HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF D.N0.6C-11/8-1/1, SOUTHERN STREET, NEAR MARKANDEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY ITS COMMISSINER, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the orders of the 14 respondent made in No.20155-3585575/2015/G1, dt. 16.12.2015 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, void and consequently direct respondents to take action on the representation dt.1i12.2015 in accordance with law, and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 55447 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to take action on the representation dt.16.12.2015, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 56415 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the respondents No.3 and 4 i.e., the unofficial Respondents as Respondents to the main Wp and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G CHANDRA SHAKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- It is submitted that the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents that the grievance of the petitioners has been adequately addressed way back in the year 2016 and as such, no further orders are required in this writ petition. 2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 09.10.2025 SR