Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5722 (KAR)

SMT.PARVATEVVA v. SMT.LOCHANAVVA

RFA/100283/2019 · 2025-01-22

Ashok S Kinagi, Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1189-DB RFA No. 100283 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100283 OF 2019 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PARVATEVVA W/O. HANAMANTAPPA KAMADOLLI AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MALALI, TQ: KUNDGOL, DHARWAD DISTRICT-582424. 2. SMT. NEELAVVA W/O. HANMANTAPPA KAMADOLLI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST/HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O MALALI, KUNDGOL, TQ: DHARWAD DISTRICT-582424 3. SMT. BASAMMA D/O. HANAMANTAPPA KAMADOLLI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST/HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: MALALI, KUNDGOL, TQ: DHARWAD DISTRICT-5824244 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. H.R. GUNDAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. LOCHANAVVA W/O. BASAPPA BADAMI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: ACCHAVVANA COLONY, SINAGAR, Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Date: 2025.01.24 10:32:58 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1189-DB RFA No. 100283 of 2019 UNKAL, HUBBALLI TQ., DHARWAD DISTRICT-580031. 2. SMT. CHANNAVVA W/O. BASANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: KUSUGAL-HUBBALLI. HUBBALLI-TQ. DHARWAD DISTRICT-580029. 3. SMT. PARVATEVVA W/O. SHEKAPPA TADAHAL AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORK. R/O: SHEREWADA, HUBBALLI-TQ, DHARWAD DISTRICT-580029. 4. FAKKIRGOUDA S/O. BASANAGOUDA KENCHANAGOUDRA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORK. R/O: MALALI, KUNDGOL-TQ. DHARWAD DISTRICT. 5. GOKUL S/O. SURESH SOMAPURKAR AGE: MAJOR AND ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE/HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: GUDAMDUR POST: HOSALLI YALLAPUR TQ, KARWAR. DISTRICT. 6. TADAS WIND ENERGY PVT. LTD., THE IL AND FS FINANCIAL CENTER, PLOT NO. C-22, G-BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.G. MOT, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. PRASHANT V. MOGALI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6; NOTICE TO R1, R2 AND R4 ARE SERVED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE-1, R/W. SEC. 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD:18.02.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.216/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KUNDGOL, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1189-DB RFA No. 100283 of 2019 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) The appellants filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The memo is placed on record. The appeal is dismissed as withdraw. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE VB ct-cmu LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 14