IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.642 of 2021 Decided on: 02.05.2025 Dr. Manu Priya ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening circumstances, relief claimed in the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous along with pending application(s), if any. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 2nd May, 2025 (vt)