APHC010551602024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28668/2024 Between: 1. JONNALAGADDA RAMA RAO, S/O. NARASIMHA RAO, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR NO.12-18-68, 5TH LANE, KRISHNA TULASI NAGAR, SWARNABHARATHI NAGAR AREA GUNTUR. 2. JONNALAGADDA JAYA SUDHA, W/O.RAMA RAO, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O.DOOR NO.12-18-68, LANE, KRISHNA TULASI NAGAR, SWARNABHARATHI NAGAR AREA, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P., 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, DGP OFFICE AT MANGALAGIRI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT. 6. INTURI SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC. PRIVATE BANKER, R/O. FLAT NO. 501, SITHARAM OLYMPIC TOWERS, 4TH LANE, A.T. AGRAHARAM, NEAR ISKON TEMPLE, REDDY COLLEGE ROAD, MALLAREDDY NAGAR, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of the respondents in granting police protection to 2 the petitioners to safeguard his life and property due to severe life threat from 6th respondent and also from their followers as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to give police protection to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to provide police protection to the petitioners to safeguard their life and property from 6th respondent and from their followers, pending the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. JAYA PRAKASH MADASU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue an order, writ or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of the respondents in granting police protection to the petitioners to safeguard his life and property due to severe life threat from 6th respondent and also from their followers as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to give police protection to the petitioner and to pass ....” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on written instructions would submit respondent Police did not receive any complaint from the Petitioner and they never called the Petitioners to the Police Station to settle the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 28668 of 2024 09.10.2025 Mjl /*