Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5721 (RAJ)

SMT. UGANTI W/O SHRI BABULAL v. OMPRAKASH S/O SHRI KAJODMAL

SAW/77/2025 · 2025-03-04

Bhuwan Goyal, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9303-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 77/2025 Smt. Uganti W/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Nangal Rajawatan, Dhani- Nalawali, Gram Gram Panchayat Nangal Rajawatan, Panchayat Samiti Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa. ----Appellant Versus 1. Omprakash S/o Shri Kajodmal, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Nangal Rajawatan, Dhani- Jojiyala, Gram Panchayat Nangal Rajawatan, Panchayat Samiti Nangal Rajawatan, District- Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Returning Officer, Panchayat Election, Gram Panchayat- Nangal Rajawatan, Election Tehsil Nangal Rajawatan, District- Dausa, Through District Election Officer (Panchayat Election), District Collector, Dausa. 3. District Election Officer (Panchayat Election), Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nikhil Simlote For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ayush Singh & Ms. Shraddha Mehta on behalf of Mr. Punit Singhvi HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/03/2025 1. By way of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the correctness and validity of the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge. On the merits of case, we are not inclined to interfere with the order as the interim order has been passed by learned Single Judge after hearing the parties and the case has been directed to be listed on 17.03.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:9303-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-77/2025] 2. The appeal is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, also stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ KAMLESH KUMAR-RAHUL/3