BALJEET SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/26465/2025 · 2025-08-02
Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57205 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57205 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 218 CRM-M-26465-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.08.2025. Baljeet Singh and others ....Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. P.S. Pandher, AAG, Punjab Mr. Neeraj K. Tyagi, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR
, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.131 dated 27.04.2019, under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC (Section 201 of IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act added later on), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise. 2 . This Court vide order dated 15.05.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Dera Bassi and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has KOMAL 2025.08.04 11:09 I attest to the accuracy of this document
CRM-M-26465-2025 (O&M) -2- submitted report dated 18.07.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.131 dated 27.04.2019, under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC (Section 201 of IPC and Section 24 of Immigration Act added later on), registered at Police Station Zirakpur, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise are quashed qua the petitioners.
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 02.08.2025 Komal
Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.08.04 11:09 I attest to the accuracy of this document