APHC010195552021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11130/2021 Between: 1. TIRUPAL, S/O KATAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 2. H.PREM RAJ, S/O KULLAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. 3. RAMA MOHAN, S/O OBULESU, AGED 40 YEARS. 4. VENKATAMMA, W/O MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 5. VANNAPPA, S/O VANNURAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 6. ARUNA, W/O NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 7. NARASIMHULU, S/O PEDA NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. 8. SAROJAMMA, W/O PEDA NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 9. GANGADHAR, S/O RANGANNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 10. RAMESH, S/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF GOVINDAM PAILI VILLAGE, BUKKARAYA SAMUDRAM MANDALAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR, ANATHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BUKKARAYA SAMUDRAM POLICE STATION, BUKKARAYA SAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUKKARAYA SAMUDRAM POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 6. B KULLAYAPPA, S/O LATE NARAPPA, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO.27-550, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, ANANTHAPUR TOWN, ANANTHPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 2 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioners and respondent no.6 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent 4 and 5 not to interfere in the civil disputes.” 2. None represented for the Petitioners. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not calling the Petitioners and not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to summon the Petitioners to the Police Station without there being any crime registered against them and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.6. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11130 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh