Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57199 (AP)

Attar Chand Basha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5499/2020 · 2025-10-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010089932020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5499/2020 Between: 1. ATTAR CHAND BASHA,, S/O. ATTAR ABDUL KHADAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS AND EX. M.L.A, R/O. D.NO.11- 300/A, BANDU SAHEB STREET, KADIRI, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL INTELLIGENCE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. RESERVE INSPECTOR, DISTRICT SECURITY WING, OFFICE OF THE RESERVE INSPECTOR, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5499 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the proceedings of L. 5th respondent issued in C.No.40/R1-DSW/ATP/2020 dated 11.02.2020 as illegal, arbitrary and in violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to provide the same security i.e., 1 puls 1 security officers to the petitioner and pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation as and when required. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 5499 of 2020 Dated.09.10.2025 UPS 138