IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 241 Dr.Shri Ram Chopra State of Haryana & others CORAM : Present: TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA of the ‘Limited Cashless Medical Facility Haryana vide letter dated 20.11.2017 Cashless Policy, 2024 2. been rendered infructuous facility to the petitioner in terms of into by the seventh respondent with the petitioner. 3. remaining medical reimburseme account within 4. objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 5. May 16, 2025 Sailesh Whether speaking/reasoned : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Dr.Shri Ram Chopra Versus State of Haryana & others CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr.Karan Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Parveen Mehta, Deputy Advocate General TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) Petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to give benefits Limited Cashless Medical Facility Haryana vide letter dated 20.11.2017, Annexure P olicy, 2024, Annexure P-8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous, as the hospital ha facility to the petitioner in terms of the agreement dated 16.05.2025, entered into by the seventh respondent with the petitioner. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, contends that the remaining medical reimbursement amount account within ten days. In view of the statement, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. May 16, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13606-2025 Decided on : 16.05.2025 ……Petitioner Versus ……Respondents TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , for the petitioner. eputy Advocate General, Haryana. Petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to give benefits Limited Cashless Medical Facility’ notified by the Government of , Annexure P-6, or under the prevailing Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has as the hospital has extended the cashless treatment agreement dated 16.05.2025, entered into by the seventh respondent with the petitioner. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, contends that the amount will be credited to the petitioner’s earned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes Yes/No Petitioner is seeking directions to the respondents to give benefits notified by the Government of prevailing Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has cashless treatment agreement dated 16.05.2025, entered Learned State Counsel, on instructions, contends that the will be credited to the petitioner’s earned counsel for the petitioner has no (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) SAILESH RANJAN 2025.05.22 09:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document