APHC010320202021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19225/2021 Between: SMT. NAMBURI KANAKAMAHA LAKSHMI NAGARATNAM, W/O NULI BHASKARA RAO, (D/O NAMBURI KONDA BABU) AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 65-8-7/B, MEHARNAGAR, KONDAYYAPALEM, KAKINADA, E.G.DT (AP). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF AP, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, E.G.DT. (AP) 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, LAW AND ORDER, KAKINADA TOWN, KAKINADA, E.G.DT. 4. TIRUMALASETTI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE TIRUMALASETTI VEERANNA, D.NO.L-22-5, SRIRAM NAGAR, SURYARAO PETA, KONDAYYAPALEM, KAKINADA, E.G.DT. 5. TIRUMALASETTI VEERABABU, S/O LATE TIRUMALASETTI SURYANARAYANA, D.NO.1-13-23, KONDAYYAPALEM ROAD, SURYARAO PETA, KAKINADA, E.G.DT. 6. TIRUMALASETTI GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O LATE TIRUMALASETTI SURYANARAYANA, D.NO.I-13-23, KONDAYYAPALEM ROAD, SURYARAO PETA, KAKINADA, E.G.DT. 7. TIRUMALASETTI SATISH, S/O LATE TIRUMALASETTI VEERANNA, D.NO.70-19 B-3/3 SIDDARTHA NAGAR, KAKINADA-533003 E.G.DT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 3 for not taking any action and not registering any crime against the unofficial Respondents, is illegal from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of petitioner's site by not allowing and obstructing to construct house with collusion of the unofficial respondent in the site Admeasuring 84.5sq.yds., out of 150 sq.yds., of house D.No.65-8-7/B, ward No.29, Block No.65, Mehar Nagar, Kondayyapalem village, Kakinada Urban, Kakinada is illegal since the matter related to civil in nature.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case has been registered against the unofficial Respondents. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri K.V.Seshagiri Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19225 of 2021 Dt.09.10.2025 Dinesh