APHC010162442011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 716/2011 Between: 1. MABASHA, S/O.ALLABAKASH MIAH, MUSLIM R/O.THOTA STREET, ORVAKAL [V] & [M], KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT ANR, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS O/O.KURNOOL. 2. THE MANAGER, SRI CHENNAKESAVA ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE O/O.ORVAKAL [V] & [M], KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. PALA SUBBA REDDY, S/O AMMAYYAGARI PULLA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, OCCUPATION NOT KNOWN, R/O ORVAKAL VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. IMPLEADED VIDE C.O.DT 29.03.2012 IN CMAMP 2094/11 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 1310 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the judgement and decree in OA No.1003/2010 [Old No.13/2009 D.C., Kurnool] dated 19.11.2010 on the file of the Endowments Tribunal, Hyderbad, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 2094 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as Respondent No. 3 to the CMA and CMP IA NO: 6 OF 2011(CMAMP 43544 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N MUKUND REDDY 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments The Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT: Despite the matter being listed today i.e., on 10.10.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellant. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 12.09.2025, 29.08.2025, 31.07.2025, 17.07.2025, and 26.06.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. 2. Therefore, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 10th October, 2025 cbn 4 122 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CMA No.716 of 2011 10th October, 2025 cbn