APHC010253272006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13597/2006 Between: 1. P.SUBRAHMANYAM, NELLORE DISTRICT., S/O.BUJJI REDDY, R/O.DAKKILI VILLAGE & POST, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PINANKINI GRAMEENA BANK NELLORE DISTRICT, Head Office, Nellore, Nellore District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issued a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner as Messenger-cum-Sweeper on regular basis as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent to consider the claims of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Messenger-cum-Sweeper on regular basis and pass such other or further order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 16908 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to consider the claims of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Messenger-cum-Sweeper on regular basis pending disposal of the above W.P. and pass such other or further orders. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 102008 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V UMA DEVI 3 The Court made the following order: Sri P.Gangarami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that despite best efforts, the petitioner has not been in contact with him for a long time. Since the matter pertains to the year 2006 and the petitioner has not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that he has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 09.10.2025 MP 4 218 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13597 of 2006 Dated: 09.10.2025 MP