Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5718 (UTT)

ANEETA ALIAS BEENA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

HABC/10/2025 · 2025-06-06

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4602-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA Habeas Corpus Petition No. 10 OF 2025 6th June, 2025 Aneeta @ Beena …… Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and and Others …… Respondents Presence:- Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. --------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar) We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General, on instructions, submits that he has been informed that the corpus is not in the custody of the 3rd respondent and 4th respondent and that the 3rd respondent has informed the Police that he last interacted with the corpus in 2020 and, thereafter, there has been no interaction. 3. The submissions are placed on record. 1 2025:UHC:4602-DB 4. Petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the Police if she so desires to lodge a man missing complaint. 5. Petition stands ordered accordingly. 6. No order as to costs. ________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. ____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 6th June, 2025 Ujjwal 2