Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57176 (AP)

Mr. Kasibotla Ravi Naga Kishore, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/5535/2019 · 2025-10-08

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010124882019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5535/2019 Between: 1. MR. KASIBOTLA RAVI NAGA KISHORE,, S/O.LATE K.VENKTAPPAIAH, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC - BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO. 18-244-1A, ENGLISHPALEM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SMT. KASIBOTLA BALATRIPURA SUNDARI,, W/O.LATE K.VENKTAPPAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC - BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO. 18-244-1A, ENGLISHPALEM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUCHIPUDI POLICE STATION, KUCHIPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. MR DURGA UMA MAHESHWAR RAO, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUCHIPUDI POLICE STATION, KUCHIPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. MRIANGETI 2 VENKATESWARA RAO, ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUCHIPUDI POLICE STATION, KUCHIPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the Respondents No. 4 and 5, in interfering with the civil disputes and threatening the petitioner to settle the matter with the third parties without any basis or authority, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and apart from being violative of principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the Petitioners, pending final disposal of the main writ petition, Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATA RANGADAS KANURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5535 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Venkata Rangadas Kanuri, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 09.10.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5535 of 2019 Date: 09.10.2025 PSA