Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010195672022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 11388/2022 Between:
1. CHINTAY. APPA RAO, S/O DEMUDU, AGED. 52 YEARS, R/O H.T4O. 3-17, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. EROTHI RAMUDU, S/O SAMUDRAM, AGED. 71 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-2, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. BELA APPALARAJU, S/O NAGANNA, AGED. 33 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-65, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. SMT. BHEEMAVARAPU RAMANAMMA, W/O APPALA RAJU, AGED. 47 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-60, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. CHINTALA LAXMANA, S/O APPALA KONDA, AGED. 40 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-21, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. NAKKA APPA RAO, S/O RAMULU, AGED. 50 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3- 84, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. GORAPALLI RAMU, S/O APPANNA, AGED. 44 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3- 33, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. GORAPALLI SANYASI RAO, S/O RAMU NAIDU, AGED. 34 YEARS,
2
R/O BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 9. JAJIMOGGALA MUTYALU, S/O POTHURAJU, AGED. 57 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-70, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 10. SIYYADRI GOPALAM, S/O AMMATHALLI, AGED. 57 YEARS, R/O BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 11. SMT. SIYYADRI EASWARAMMA, W/O GOPAL, AGED. 52 YEARS, R/O BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 12. SIYYADRI KOTESWAR RAO, S/O APPALAKONDA, AGED. 56 YEARS, R/O. GH.NO. 3-107, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 13. SIYYADRI DEMUDU, S/O SIMHA2HALAM, AGED. 69 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-90, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 14. PARRI PYDI RAJU @ PYDITALLI, AGED. 57 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3- 71, BODDUNAIDUPALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 15. GORAPALLI RAMU NAIDU, S/O SANYASI, AGED. 52 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-77, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 16. NAKKA SANNAMMA, S/O AMMATALLI, AGED. 61 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-43/2, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 17. CHINTALA APPANNA, S/O LATCHAYYA, AGED. 76 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-24, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 18. GORAPALLI APPA RAO, S/O RAMU NAIDU, AGED. 57 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3-27, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 19. CHINTALA APPALAKONDA, S/O LATCHAYYA, AGED. 76 YEARS, R/O BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL,
3
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 20. BHEEMAVARAPU APPALARAJU, S/O KANNAYYA, AGED. 56 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-60, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 21. SMT. CHINTALA SATTAMMA, W/O VENKAYYA, AGED.
47 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-11, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 22. SMT. GONE LAXMI, W/O DEMUDAMMA, AGED. 53 YEARS, R/O MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 23. GORLE APPALA NAIDU, S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED. 72 YEARS, R/O H.NO.1-45, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 24. UGGINA KONDA BABU, S/O PYDITHALLI @ PYDAIAH, AGED. 56 YEARS, R/O H.NO.2-96, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 25. SMT. BEELA PARVATHI, W/O NAGANNA, AGED. 61 YEARS, R/O H.NO.3-65, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 26. SMT. KALIGI RAMULAMMA, W/O RAMUDU, AGED. 74 YEARS, R/O BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 27. PARRI RAMU NAIDU, S/O ATCHANNA, AGED. 62 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3-27, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 28. PARRI MUSILI NAIDU, S/O MUSILI ATCHANNA, AGED. 51 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3-38, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 29. SMT. MANDE SOMULAMMA, W/O GANGA RAJU, AGED. 49 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 3-106, BODDU NAIDU PALEM, MUDAPAKA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
4
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.,
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM
4. THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to take possession of the assigned and possessed agricultural lands of the petitioners mentioned in the attached schedule Annexed WI this petition situated in Mudapaka Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, on which they are eking their livelihood treating them as encroachers though they have pattas in their favor, on the premise of providing house sites under the scheme Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu in the name of Voluntary Land Pooling without deciding the entitlement of the petitioners for developed plots as per their eligibility under G.O.Ms.No. 72, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, dated.
25-01-2020 and without obtaining any consent from the petitioners as illegal, un constitutional and against the judgment of the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in WP(PIL) No.64 of 2022 and against the principles of Natural Justice besides violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners of their above said agricultural lands in any manner including their dispossession and not to allot the same as house sites, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction against the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the agricultural lands of the petitioners
5
mentioned in the attached schedule Annexed to this petition situated in Mudapaka Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in any manner including their dispossession and allotment of the same as house sites under the scheme "Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu", during the pendency of this writ petition, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Implead the petitioners/proposed Respondent as Respondent Nos. 5 & 6 in the above writ petition and also in miscellaneous application I.A. No.1/2022 also in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Implead the petitioner/proposed Respondent as Respondent No. 5 in the above writ petition and also in miscellaneous application I.A. No.1/2022 also in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Implead the petitioners/proposed Respondent as Respondent Nos.
5 & 6 in the above writ petition and also in miscellaneous application I.A. No.1/2022 also in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on Dt.06.05.2022 in IA No.1/2022 of W.P.No.11388/2022 and dismiss the WP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
6
The Court made the following order:
Sri K.Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 13.10.2025 MP
7
73
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION No.11388 OF 2022 Dated : 13.10.2025
MP