HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 10851 of 2023 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Sri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant and learned AGA for the State are present. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has informed that the present criminal appeal was filed against the rejection of bail. As the appellant has been convicted in the said case, he has prayed to dismiss this criminal appeal, having been infructuous. 3. Taking into account the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 9, 2025 Ujjawal Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Raghav Ram (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Suraj Pal .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad