Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57150 (KAR)

YOGESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/12480/2023 · 2025-08-12

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31315 CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12480 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. YOGESH KUMAR S/O GANESH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 2. SMT KAMALAMMA W/O GANESH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 3. JAYASHREE W/O KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 4. SMITHA D/O KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO.3007, BALAGERI OPP CANARA BANK ATM RAMANAGARA TOWN-562159 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.H.BHAGAVAN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31315 CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION RAMANAGARA REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX BENGALURU-560001 2. MAMATHA W/O YOGESH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A BALAGERI, RAMANAGARA TOWN-562159 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.957/2023 (IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.108/2022) OF RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 323, 324, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT RAMANAGARA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31315 CRL.P No. 12480 of 2023 2. No representation for petitioners even in the second round. 3. Vide order dated 31.07.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting a week's time to comply with the office objections. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with. 4. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 5. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15