Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5715 (GAU)

ABED ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

AB/144/2025 · 2025-02-13

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007052025 2025:GAU-AS:1537 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/144/2025 ABED ALI S/O LATE SATTAR ALI R/O VILL- BAIRAPUR P.S. SORBHOG, PIN-781317, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SAHIDA BIBI (INFORMANT) W/O SAHAR ALI R/O VILL- BAIRAPUR P.S. SORBHOG DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78131 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A L MANDAL, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 14/02/2025 Heard Mr. A L Mandal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State. 2. The petitioner, namely, Abed Ali, son of Late Sattar Ali, resident of Village-Bairapur, P.S. Sorbhog, District-Barpeta, has filed this application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest in Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023 registered under Section 4 of POCSO Act, which is now registered as Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012. 3. Perused the records of Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 that was called for by order dated 27.01.2025 from the Court of learned Special Judge (POCSO)-cum-Additional Sessions Judge., Barpeta. 4. It is seen from the records that the petitioner is a charge-sheeted accused in said Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023 and during the investigation of the case, the petitioner evaded arrest. As such, in the charge-sheet filed on 31.10.2023 in said Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023, the petitioner was shown to be an absconder. After receipt of the charge-sheet of said Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023, said case was registered as Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 and the learned POCSO Court, Barpeta rejected his pre-arrest bail in said Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023 on 10.11.2023 considering that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the case. In the said Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023, the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Barpeta took cognizance of the offence under Section 4 of the POCSO Act on 19.12.2023 and issued summon to the petitioner for his appearance. In spite of the information, the petitioner did not appear before the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Barpeta in said Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023. 5. On perusal of this pre-arrest bail application filed by the petitioner, it is seen that the petitioner is fully aware of the dates as to when the said Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 was fixed and that he is also aware that Bailable Warrant of Arrest has been issued to him for his appearance in the matter. Further, the petitioner is also aware of the medical report of the minor victim girl involved in the case. Page No.# 3/3 6. Considering the above and the records of Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 arising out of Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023, this Court is not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner, named above, in said Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 arising out of Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023, since cognizance has already been taken by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Barpeta. 7. Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application of the petitioner, Abed Ali, in said Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 arising out of Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023 stands rejected. 8. The petitioner may approach the appropriate forum for his regular bail in said Special (POCSO) Case No. 172/2023 arising out of Sorbhog P.S. Case No. 93/2023. JUDGE Comparing Assistant