Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57145 (KAR)

DINESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4955/2025 · 2025-07-14

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26003 WP No. 4955 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 4955 OF 2025 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: DINESH S/O.NARAYANA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, H.NO.2-196, SALMAR HOUSE, UPPOOR VILLAGE, TENKABETTU, UDUPI TALUK AND DIST., - 576 105. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA N, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION SOCIETY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, THE RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KUNDAPURA SUB DIVISION, KUNDAPURA - 576 201. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26003 WP No. 4955 of 2025 3. MURTHEDARARA SEVA SAHAKARASANGA (L), (REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT) REP. BY ITS CEO, BRAHMAVARA, UDUPI TALUK & DIST., - 576 213. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FORM NO. 8 AND 9 AUCTION NOTICES DATED 21.12.2024 ISSUED BY THE RECOVERY OFFICER OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, COURT OF THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KUNDAPURA SUB DIVISION, KUNDAPURA IN DISPUTE NO. 232/2022-23, E.P.NO. 178/2022-23 AT ANNX-A AND B AT ANNX-A AND B AND ALL OTHER FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO. (IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS CONCERN) AND ETC., . THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26003 WP No. 4955 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioner. Interim order dated 20.02.2025 has also not been complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Registry is directed to put up the above order in the event of the petitioner filing any other petition on similar grounds against the respondents. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE VM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14 CT: BHK