Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57143 (CHH)

CHOLAMANDALAM M.S GENERAL INSURNCE COMPANY LIMITED v. KU. SHAKSHI SHARMA

CR/186/2025 · 2025-12-08

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:59848 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 186 of 2025 1 - Cholamandalam M.S General Insurnce Company Limited Through - Its Legal Manager, Present And Correct Address- Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Limited, Main Road Near Vinayak Netralaya, Vyapar Vihar, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Ku. Shakshi Sharma D/o Poonam Chand Sharma Aged About 14 Years Being Minor Represented Through Next Friend/father Poonam Chand Sharma, S/o Gopal Prasad R/o Maveshi Bazar Balouda, P.S. And Tehsil - Balouda, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Deepak Thakur S/o Babulal Thakur Aged About 24 Years R/o Chingrajpara, P.S. Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Babulal Thakur S/o Laxman Thakur Aged About 49 Years R/o Chingrajpara, P.S. Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/12/2025 1. By way of this revision petition, the applicant has prayed for RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 following reliefs:- “It, is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant Civil Revision and set aside the impugned order dated 13/02/2025 passed by First Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Janjgir, District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) in Claim Case No.20/2025 between 'Ku. Shakshi Sharma vs. Deepak Thakur and others' and to dismiss the claim petition filed by the claimant holding that same is barred by limitation, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the revision petition with liberty to raise all these grounds in the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat