1 2025:CGHC:8716 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 540 of 2025 1 - Suresh Soni S/o Late Chhedi Lal Soni Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Seoni, Tahsil - Marwahi, District Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh . Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Narayan Prasad Soni S/o Late Chhedi Lal Soni Aged About 57 Years R/o Village - Seoni, Tahsil Marwahi, District - Gorella-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 2 - Ravi Prakash Soni S/o Narayan Prasad Soni Aged About 40 Years R/o Village - Seoni, Tahsil Marwahi, District - Gorella-Pendra-Marwahi Chhattisgarh 3 - Tahsildar, Marwahi District Gourella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh. (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 30-01-2025) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 19/02/2025 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashment of order dated 16/01/2025 passed by the Tahsildar, whereby the Tahsildar recalled the interim order dated 07/10/2024 and directed to constitute a Committee consisting Halka Patwari and Revenue Inspector for making RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.02.20 12:19:22 +0530 2 demarcation of land bearing Khasra No. 1300 and to submit a report. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the Tahsildar had passed an order directing respondent No. 1 & 2 not to raise any construction over the land of the petitioner i.e. Khasra No. 1300/3, however, by the impugned order dated 16/01/2025, the said order has been recalled and a direction to constitute a Committee consisting of Halka Patwari and Revenue Inspector was made who has to inquire about the contention of the petitioner whether respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are raising construction over the land of the petitioner or not?. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that the Tahsildar has already directed to inquire into the matter by a Committee consisting of Halka Patwari and Revenue Inspector. The Committee shall inquire about the fact alleged by the petitioner within a stipulated period, therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of . 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the order dated 16/01/2025 and 07/10/2024. 5. From perusal of the order dated 07/10/2024, it is quite vivid that the Tahsildar had directed respondent No. 1 & 2 not to raise any construction over the land of the petitioner i.e. 1300/3, however, when the petitioner intimated the Tahsildar that some construction are being raised over the land of the petitioner, the Tahsildar had directed to constitute a Committee consisting of Halka Patwari and Revenue Inspector who has to inquire about the contention of the petitioner. 6. Therefore, at this stage, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction 3 to the Tahsildar to ascertain the fact whether any construction is being raised by respondent No. 1 & 2 over the land of the petitioner within a period of 25 days from today and take necessary steps in accordance with law, if it found that illegal construction has been raised over the land of the petitioner. 7. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul