M/s Soltek Photovoltek Private Limited v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/14001/2024 · 2025-10-08
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57138 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57138 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010281202024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 14001/2024 Between:
1. M/S SOLTEK PHOTOVOLTEK PRIVATE LIMITED, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT D.NO. 54-9-55, 100 FEET ROAD, JAWAHAR AUTONAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUNKARA MANEESH S/O SUNKARA CHANDRA SEKHAR AZAD, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO. 31-13-26/A, BOYAPATI MADHAVARAO STREET, MOGHALRAJAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LTD, REP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.I.I.C TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE ZONAL MANAGER, A.P. INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED, ZONAL OFFICE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VIJAYAWADA -7, NTR DISTRICT.
4. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, APIIC LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, APIIC TOWERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. SANTHI CHANDRA SC For APIIC
2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Ms. R. Sneha Latha, learned Counsel representing Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, submits that the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has filed a Letter in the Registry on 25.09.2025 along with the Letter from the Writ Petitioner, seeking to withdraw this Writ Petition. Both the Letters are taken on record.
2. Request granted.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:09.10.2025 Vns