Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57122 (AP)

P. JAGANNADHA RAO v. THE GOVERNMENT OF A.P., SECY,COOP., DEPT,

WP/13975/2002 · 2025-10-08

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010818762002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NOs: 13975/2002, 17749/2002 & 26177/2006 Between: 1. P.JAGANNADHA RAO, VIZAG,, S/O.LATE RANGAIAH, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, R/O.D.NO.26/4/12, KUMMARI STREET, DASANNAPETA POST, VIZINAGARAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P SECY COOP DEPT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, REP. GENERAL MANAGER. VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to reinstate the petition forthwith with all consequential benefits including promotion, revised pay scales, increments and other benefits attanched to the post including arrears of salary from the date of his suspension till the date of reinstatement by revoking suspension order dated 28/07/2000 and pass such other order or orders as it may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 17450 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to reinstate the petitioner by revoking the suspension orders issued by him dated 28/07/2000 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as it may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 101806 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SATYA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NOs: 13975/2002, 17749/2002 & 26177/2006 COMMON ORDER: Sri Prakash Buddarapu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner in all the writ petitions is one and the same and he died and his legal representatives are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 09th October, 2025 RKS