Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57121 (AP)

VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS v. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS & 5 ORS

CMA/250/2012 · 2025-10-08

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010583162012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 250/2012 Between: 1. VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS, S/O.LATE SRI PULLAIAH SASTRY R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. V.NAGARAJU, S/O.SUBRAHMANYAM R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. VYAMAJALA JAGAN MOHAN SARMA, S/O.SIDDAIAH R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS 5 ORS, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF A.P. O/O.TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, EMDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT O/O.TIRUAPTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, EMDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT O/O.GUNTUR. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, EMDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT O/O.NELLORE. 5. SRI RAMA MANDIRAM, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER C/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. GANDAVARAPU SYAMALAMMA, D/O.SUBBARAMI REDDY R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 452 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant leave to the appellants to file the present appeal before this Hon'ble court against the orders passed on 17.04.2010 passed by the 3rd respondent i.e., the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Departments, Guntur IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 523 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order passed on 17-4-2010 in OA NO. 15 of 2009 by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the CMA and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2012(CMAMP 1580 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate theinterim order dated 28-3-2012 made in CMA.MP.NO.523 of 2012 in CMA.No. 250 of 2012 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1948 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt.28-03-2012 made in CMA MP.No.523/2012 in CMA No.250/2012 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 390 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28.03.2012 in CMA MP No.523/2012 in CMA No.250/2012 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CMAMP 555 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to condone the delay 29 days in filing the restoration petition against the dismissal order dated:06.02.2014 made inCMAMP NO.1948/2013 in CMA NO.250/2012 and pass 3 IA NO: 3 OF 2014(CMAMP 798 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 6-2-2014 and restore the CMA No. 250 of 2012 in CMAMP NO. 1948 of 2013 to file and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. V S R MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR APPEALS 2. V T M PRASAD 3. T C KRISHNAN 4. . The Court made the following: 4 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellants appeared virtually and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present civil miscellaneous appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 9th October, 2025 cbn 5 181 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CMA No.250 of 2012 9th October, 2025 cbn