APHC010597192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11796/2025 Between: 1. P. MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY, S/O. MR. P. SYAMPRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. CONSULTING DIRECTOR - WORK FROM HOME IN TIRUPATI, R/O. FLAT NO.202, HARINI NIVASAM, SHANTI NAGAR, K.T. ROAD, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. DR V SAHITHI VIRUPAKSHI POOJA, W/O.P.MOHITH SUNDAR REDDY (D/O.V.G.SIVASANKARA REDDY), AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. DENTIST/DENTIST-TUTOR IN HYDERABAD (6 TO 7 YEARS OF EXP. TILL SEP/OCT 2020), UNKNOWN OCCUPATION (PRESENT), R/O. DOOR NO.19-12-199, PAVANI NAGAR, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 517501. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI - 522239. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be I. Pleased to set aside the impugned Docket Order dt.03/10/2025 passed in C.F.R. No.4244 of 2025 in Unnumbered I.A of 2025 FCOP No.306 of 2023 in the Honble Court of the Judge, Family Court -cum- V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, whereby Trial Court directed the Petitioner-herein to issue notice to the Respondent, and directed the Respondent to file counter before numbering the Petition and before conducting inquiry into the Petition filed u/s.379 of BNSS (340 Cr.P.C.) II. Pleased to consequently direct the learned Trial Court to number the said petition A and conduct inquiry on the basis of the record or prima facie evidence already before the Court, and record a finding as per the provisions of 379 and 215 of BNSS (340 and 195 of Cr.P.C.) r/w binding law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in Pritish vs. State of Maharashtra 2002 1 see 253 and reaffirmed 2 in State of Punjab vs. Jasbir Singh 2020 INSe 226, expeditiously preferably within a time frame stipulated by this Hon’ble High Court or forthwith on the same day of the receipt of the orders/directions of this Hon'ble High Court; III. Pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. PARTY IN PERSON Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up, party-in-person, Sri P.Mohit Sundar Reddy (petitioner herein) sought permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition. Permission is accorded. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*