Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5712 (ALL)

MUNISH KUMAR KASHYAP v. MANAGING DIRECTOR PASCHIMANCHAL VIDUYT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/705/2025 · 2025-02-07

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18568 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 705 of 2025 Petitioner :- Munish Kumar Kashyap Respondent :- Managing Director Paschimanchal Viduyt Vitran Nigam Limited And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Krishna Agarawal Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Rajendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3. The petitioner claims to change his designation from TG-2 (Line) to TG-2 (Electrical) and also other consequential benefits. He has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Shri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, he fairly contends that the aforesaid claim is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In the wake of preceding discussions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No.2- Superintending Engineer Electricity Distribution Circle, Amroha is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner regarding change of his designation from TG-2 (Line) to TG-2 (Electrical) including other consequential benefits, preferably, within a period of three months as per law from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Jaswant Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad