APHC010733952015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Friday, The Tenth day of October Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 37949 of 2015 Between: Gunturu Mirchi Ammakam Rytula Sankshema Sangham ...Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Penumaka Venkata Rao Counsel for the respondents: 1. Chintapalli Srinivas 2. Gangisetty Rajeswara rao, Standing Counsel for Agricultural Marketing Committees 3. G.P. for Agriculture The Court made the following: ORDER: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th respondent in preventing the farmers from selling the Mirchi and Cotton through open auction in 4th respondent Market Yard premises is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce & Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 and the Rules framed thereunder and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 6.11.2015 and allow the petitioners to do sell their produce through open auction in the 4th respondent market committee / yard and pass...” 02. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested to close the writ petition giving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate relief as and when required, since as on date, there is no need for an order in terms of the relief claimed. 03. The learned Standing Counsel for A.M.C. represented that e-NAM is being adopted for all the traders and the petition can be closed. 04. In view of these submissions, as no relief is required now, without going into the merits of the contentions, the writ petition is dismissed, giving the liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court as and when required with regard to the relief claimed. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ B. S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt.10.10.2025 NSM 71 The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi WRIT PETITION No.37949 of 2015 Dt.10.10.2025 NSM