Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57117 (AP)

SMT CHINTALAPUDI SUNEETHA v. MANTINI PRADOSH

CRP/2519/2025 · 2025-10-09

R Raghunandan Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010511362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2519/2025 Between: 1. SMT CHINTALAPUDI SUNEETHA, W/O SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF PLOT NO. 109, FLAT NO.201, JYOTHI PRIYAMVADA ORCHID, SRINAGAR COLONY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500073. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MANTINI PRADOSH, S/o Parvitisam Naidu, aged 46 years, R/o Fiat No.203, Capri Towers, Plot No.112, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to present the above revision is filed aggrieved by the Docket Order dt 21-08-2025 in I.A.No. 291 of 2025 in O.S.No. 219 of 2018 on the file of the court of the XI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the certified copy Order dt: 21-08-2025 in I.A. No. 291 of 2025 in OS 219/2018on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam for time being, and pass 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of ail further proceeding in OS 219/2018on the file of XI Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above Revision Petition in this Honourable court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SINGURU SAI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this civil revision petition with liberty to file a fresh revision petition along with copies of contemporaneous signatures. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date: 10.10.2025 KA 4 172 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2519/2025 Date: 10.10.2025 KA