1 2025:CGHC:52455 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8045 of 2018 Mukund Ram Sahu S/o Shri Chhoturam Sahu Aged About 56 Years Posted As Senior Assistant, Paddy Collection Center, Bhanupratappur, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, District - Kanker, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Sixth Floor, Tower 'C', Commercial Complex, C.B.D. Sector - 21, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Sixth Floor, Tower 'C', Commercial Complex, C.B.D. Sector - 21, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., 4 - The Manager (Establishment) Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Sixth Floor, Tower 'C', Commercial Complex, C.B.D. Sector - 21, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The District Manager Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, District - Kanker Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Senior Account Officer Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Sixth Floor, Tower 'C', Commercial Complex, C.B.D. Sector - 21, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.10.29 11:29:35 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. VR Tiwari, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ram Lal Rajak, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Ms. Prabha Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondents 2 to 6 : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 28/10/2025 1. At the outset, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has retired from the service, he does not wish to prosecute the writ petition, hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in allowing aforesaid prayer of the petitioner. 3. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini