SURESH KUMAR AND ORS v. SUDARSHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS.
CR/66/2019 · 2025-09-16
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5711 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5711 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CR No. 66/2019
Suresh Kumar and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Sudarshan Kumar and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Anil Khajuri, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 16.09.2025
1. The record reveals that instant civil revision was filed initially under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. The record reveals that there was no representation of behalf of the petitioners on 27.11.2019 and thereafter the matter was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners on 03.03.2020, and thereafter none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today. Inference can be drawn that the petitioners is not prosecuting the instant civil revision/ petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 16.09.2025 Nikhil
Sr. No. 10