Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78146
Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16094 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajbihari Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anees Baig Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Anees Baig, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Learned A.G.A. has informed that the notice to the informant has been served on 28.04.2025.
4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.10 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) B.N.S., 2023 and 3/4(2) POCSO Act, Police Station Nagla Khangar, District Firozabad, during the pendency of trial.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about one day and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The victim has denied being subjected to any kind of sexual assault by the applicant in her statement recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S. She is a consenting party as she has gone with the applicant all the way to Gujarat and has not raised any alarm whatsoever, rather she has expressed her willingness to marry the applicant.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that there is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 23.01.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
7. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application.
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of the FIR and the fact that the victim seems to be a consenting party, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
9. Let the applicant- Rajbihari Singh, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed.
10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
11. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.
Order Date :- 13.5.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad