Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57100 (AP)

Smt. Settipalli Anuradha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/27524/2025 · 2025-10-07

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010532762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 27524/2025 Between: 1. SMT. SETTIPALLI ANURADHA, W/ O VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE. RESIDENT OF D.NO.2-1985/2, CHENNAREDDY COLONY, PILER TOWN AND MANDAL, ANNAMAVATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE BODUMALLUVARIPALLI GRAMPANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PILER URBAN POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. SRI R MANOHARA, S/O RAMACHETTY MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.4-510, KAMATAMVARIPALLI, PILER VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. SRI SATYA, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO PRESENT MLA OF PILER CONSTITUENCY, PILER TOWN AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in demolishing the compound wall and trying to evict the petitioner from the property admeasuring an extent of 152.11 sq. yards in Sy.No.657/2A, situated in Bodumalluvaripalli Grampanchayat, Filer Mandal, Annamayya District without following due procedure of law at the behest of respondents 8 and 9 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her property and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere / evict the petitioner from the property admeasuring an extent of 152.11 sq. yards in Sy.No.657/2A, situated in Bodumalluvaripalli Grampanchayat, Filer Mandal, Annamayya District without following due procedure of law, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VIJAYA KUMAR SOMARAPU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: 1. The learned counsel Sri Vamsi Krishna, representing for the counsel for the petitioner seeks a permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and also requested to grant liberty. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 08.10.2025 klk 4 88 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Writ Petition No.27524 of 2025 08.10.2025 kkllkk