Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010006382018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/82/2018 SYED SAHIDUR RAHMAN (LEGAL HEIR OF LT. SYED MOHAMMAD SAIFUDDIN AHMED) S/O- LT. SYED MOHAMMAD SAIFUDDIN AHMED, R/O VILL.- MEJDIA, MOUZA- SARUKHEIN VERSUS MD. RASMAN ALI S/O- LT. SABED ALI, R/O VILL.- GAREMARI MAZDIA, MOUAZ- SARUKHETRI, Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BHATTACHARJEE, MS. P BHATTACHARJEE,MR. D BANERJEE Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, MR. N ISLAM,MR. D K DEKA,MR. P AHMED,MR. N AHMED Linked Case : RSA/47/2011 SYED MOHAMMAD SAIFUDDIN AHMED S/O LATE NOOR BAKSH R/O VILL. MAJDIA MOUZA-SARUKHETRI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. Page No.# 2/4 VERSUS MD. RASMAN ALI and 15 ORS S/O LATE SABED ALI 2:LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE HEBTULLAH WIFE MST. RASEMAKHATOON NOW W/O SAIFUDDIN ALI 3:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 09/02/2015 4:LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SAMIRAN NESSA SON-ASRAF ALI @ GAOMURA 5:MST AMENA KHATOON W/O LATE SAHED ALI 6:MST. FAZILA KHATOON D/O LATE SAHED ALI 7:MD. TEZEB ALI S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI 8:MD. REZAT ALI S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI 9:MD. RAFIAL ALI S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI 10:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 22.08.2014 11:MST. ABJAN NESSA W/O MD. RASMAN ALI 12:MD. SAUKAT ALI Page No.# 3/4 S/O MD. RASMAN ALI 13:MD. MAINAL ALI S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI 14:STRUCK OFF VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 11/12/2014 15:MD. YASIN ALI S/O LATE SONAULLAH 16:LEGAL HEIR OF LATE KHATOON NESSA MD. ALAUDDIN S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI CLAIMING TO BE ADOPTED SON OF KHATOON NESSA DYING UNMARRIED THE RESPONDENTS / OPPOSITE PARTIES NO. 1 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AND 16 ARE RESIDENT OF VILL. GAREMARI MAZDIA MOUZA-SARUKHETRI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 RESIDENT OF VILL. LACHIMA DIST. NALBARI ASSAM. THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 RESIDENT OF VILL. MAJDIA MOUZA-CHENGA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR.K BHATTACHARJEE Advocate for : MR.D K DEKA appearing for MD. RASMAN ALI and 15 ORS Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 13.10.2025 1. Heard Ms. P. Bhattacharjee, the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. No one has appeared for the respondents. 3. Though on perusal of the order dated 17.09.2025, it appears that the notice issued to all the respondents have been duly served. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in preferring the connected Regular Second Appeal, the delay of 1420 days have been caused. 5. The applicant has explained the delay in paragraph No.3 of the condonaton of delay application. 6. Since no one is objecting to the prayer of condonation of delay and since ground of delay stated in paragraph No. 3 of the application for condonation of delay are found to be sufficient the said delay is condoned, this Interlocutory Application is accordingly, allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant