Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 571 (UTT)

SHEETAL CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/692/2025 · 2026-07-14

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010058192025 cl SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSS No.692 of 2025 Sheetal Chauhan ………Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others ………Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Prashant Khanna, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 and 10. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that though the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming appointment as Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade (General), but now the petitioner wants to withdraw the present writ petition on the premise that her appointment is under consideration against the supernumerary post pursuant to the judgment delivered by the Division Bench in some other case. 5. Since the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition and made prayer of withdrawal of this writ petition, there is no reason to keep this petition pending. 6. Permission so sought for is granted. 7. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 14.07.2026 SK