APHC010543452023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28139/2023 Between: THOTA SUJATHA, W/O. LATE THOTA OBAIAH, AGED 73 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.26-1-46, 2ND STREET, GAYATHRI NAGAR, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH- 524 004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE DISTRICT 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, 4TH POLICE STATION (DARGAMITTA PS), NELLORE DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 4TH TOWN POLICE STATION, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KORIBILLI SANDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 2 to 4 in not taking cognizance and register the petitioner complaint/report lodged on 12-04-2023 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take cognizance of the complaint/report lodged by the petitioner on 12-04-2023 and to register an F.I.R. against the persons named therein for the offences punishable U/s.307, 324, 325, 506 R/w. 34 of IPC and further investigate into the matter in the interest of justice.” 2 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioner in Spandana, are false, as such, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. It is represented that the learned counsel for the Petitioner has become Assistant Government Pleader and there is need to change vakalat for the Petitioner. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, as no further arguments are required, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28139 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh