Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57069 (PAT)

Hasrul Alam @ Md. Haserul Alam v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./44554/2025 · 2025-09-03

Ramesh Chand Malviya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44554 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- ANGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== Hasrul Alam @ Md. Haserul Alam , aged about-23 years, male, S/O Md. Hasib @ Hasib Alam R/O Vill.- Nayatola, Muradpur, Ward no. 8, P.s.- Angarh, Dist.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Kumar Bhagat, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 3 03-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20 (B) (II) (B) of the N.D.P.S Act. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, total 14 kg 610 gm ganja has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that the recovered ganja is about 14 kg 610 gm which is much below than the commercial quantity. He further submits that petitioner is under custody since 23.03.2025. Lastly, he submits that petitioner has got clean Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44554 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering all facts and circumstances of the case, and also the fact that huge amount of contraband ganja has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, so I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. Harshita/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T