BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SMT. SHANTI
MCC/1137/2025 · 2025-11-09
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57069 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57069 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:54652
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1137 of 2025 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Registered Office, Bajaj Allianz House, Airportroad, Yerwada, (Maharashtra) Pin- 411006, Branch Office, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Shivmohan Bhavan Vidhan Shabha Road, Pandri, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) Pin-492001.
... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Shanti W/o Late Mangalram Aged About 23 2 - Ku. Puja D/o Late Mangalram Aged About 3 Years 3 - Raju S/o Late Mangalram Aged About 10 months Respondents No.2 & 3 are Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Respondent No. 1 Smt. Shanti, 4 - Sudru Ram S/o Late Tokdu Aged About 58 Years All R/o Vill.- Patarpara Tehsil- Bhairamgarh, Distt.- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Satish Biswas S/o Motilal Biswas R/o Nagar Panchayat Sukma, Kumharras, Tehsil And Distt.- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. (Driver Of Vehicle Pickup No. CG 18 H 1231) 6 - Ravindra Bala S/o Surjo Kant Bala Aged About 49 Years R/o Nagar Panchayat Sukma, Patnampara, Tehsil And District- Sukma, Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Pickup No. CG 18 H 1231)
... Respondents) For Applicant : Shri Prashant Sahu appears on behalf of Shri S.K.Kushwaha, Advocate. For Respondents 1 to 4 : Ms. Pranoti Das appears on behalf of Shri Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate.
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board Digitally signed by ALLENA ANJANI KUMAR Date: 2025.11.10 17:37:20 +0530
2 10/11/2025
1. Heard on I.A.No.1/2025, which is an application for condonation of delay of 68 days in filing the MCC for restoration.
2. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, I.A.No.01/2025 is allowed and delay of 68 days in filing the application is condoned.
3. Also heard on MCC for restoration of MAC No.71/2017 dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 17.04./2025.
4. On due consideration, I am satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown by the counsel for his non-appearance when the case was called on for hearing on 17.04.2025. The said MCC is supported by an affidavit. Therefore, M.C.C. is allowed and MAC No.71/2017 is restored to its original number.
5. A copy of this order be kept on the record of MAC No.71/2017. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE Anjani