Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36910 WP No. 36222 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.36222 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
M. P. LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY S/O. LATE PAPI REDDY AGED 66 YEARS R/AT MEDIMAKANAHALLI VILLAGE SOMENAHALLI HOBLI, GUDIBANDE TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562 101.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR BAGEPALLI TALUK, BAGEPALLI CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT – 561 207.
4.
YADHAVA COMMUNITY SAMUDHAYA BHAVAN BAGEPALLI TALUK, BAGEPALLI
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36910 WP No. 36222 of 2024
CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT – 561 207 REGISTERED UNDER REGISTRATION ACT REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SESHU V., H.C.G.P., FOR R-1 TO R-3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE UNDER TAKING GIVEN BY THE R-3 AUTHORITY IN CCC NO.280/2022 BY ISSUING FORM NO.1 TO 5 IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY BEARING SY NO.13 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 01-00 ACRE SITUATED AT GUNDALAPALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT BY HOLDING SURVEY BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09.09.2024 WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-R AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that after the writ petition was filed, survey has been conducted identifying the property of the petitioner and respondent No.4. The petitioner is satisfied with the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36910 WP No. 36222 of 2024
action taken. Therefore, the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY/- CT:VC