VINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/26321/2025 · 2025-05-19
Harpreet Kaur Jeewan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57044 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57044 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-26321-2025 :1: 134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-26321-2025 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 VINOD KUMAR AND ANOTHER ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. S.K.Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vajir Singh Mor, Mr. Nitin Sachdeva and Mr. Rajat Sheokand, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to decide the complaint of the petitioners, dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-17) in accordance with the law and within a time bound manner.
2. Notice of motion.
3. Having received advance copy of the petition, Mr. Satjot Singh, AAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
4.
Learned counsel for the State, has submitted that the complaint of the petitioners, dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P-17) would be enquired into and proper action, if required, shall be taken within a period of three weeks from today. Priyanka Thakur 2025.05.21 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-26321-2025 :2:
5. Keeping in view the statement given by learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of.
6. The State shall remain bound by its statement given in Court today.
(HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) 19.05.2025
JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No
Priyanka Thakur 2025.05.21 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document