APHC010499032021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29952/2021 Between: 1. PUTTA LAKSHMI, WIFE OF PUTTA VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE AND RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.4-24, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. PUTTA SIVA KRISHNA, SON OF PUTTA VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE AND RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.4-24, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. PUTTA SRI SWATHI, WIFE OF PUTTA SIVA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE AND RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.4-24, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. PUTTA SRINIVASA RAO, SON OF PUTTA VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, PRIVATE EMPLOYEE AND RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.4-24, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. PUTTA LAKSHMI BHARGAVI, WIFE OF PUTTA SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE AND RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.4-24, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR (URBAN), GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2 6. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Man6amus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent Nos. 5 and 6 threatening the petitioners with false police cases by threatening them to discharge the debts of Putta Venkateswara Rao by involving in civil matters as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and may IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased it is also just and necessary that pending disposal of the above writ petition to direct the respondent nos. 5 and 6 not to call upon the petitioners to police station and to insist them t6 settle the debts of Putta Venkateswara Rao by involving in disputes in which they are not related pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ALAPATI ROHINI SRINIVAS MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioners seeking the following relief: “... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Man6amus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent Nos. 5 and 6 threatening the petitioners with false police cases by threatening them to discharge the debts of Putta Venkateswara Rao by involving in civil matters as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and may ....” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the Petitioners and one Venkateswara Rao and that respondent Police never insisted them to settle the disputes and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 29952 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*